Showing posts with label flying saucers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label flying saucers. Show all posts

Saturday, January 20, 2007

MORE ON UFOS


(Thanks to Wm. M. Mott) MORE STUFF From WorldNet Daily

WND Exclusive
PHOTONETDAILY
UFO frenzy ignited by Air Force officer
Others report strange phenomenon, digital expert views possible 'pilot'

Posted: January 19, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Joe Kovacs
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


Zoomed image of mysterious orange light seen Jan. 9 near Van Buren, Ark. (photo: Col. Brian Fields, USAF, ret.)

A retired Air Force colonel who photographed mysterious, colorful lights hovering over western Arkansas last week has ignited a frenzy of interest in unexplained airborne phenomena, as WND has received numerous reports of similar sightings across the U.S., while a digital expert has filtered the pictures to reveal startling images of what he says could be the "pilot" of the unidentified craft.

"I believe these lights were not of this world, and I feel a duty and responsibility to come forward," said Col. Brian Fields, who spent nearly 32 years in the military piloting F-16 fighter jets. "I have no idea what they were."

As WND exclusively reported, Fields, 61, was at his Van Buren, Ark., home Jan. 9 when just before 7 p.m., he observed two intensely bright lights as he looked to the southeast close to the horizon.


Zoomed image of mysterious yellow light seen Jan. 9 near Van Buren, Ark. (photo: Col. Brian Fields)

"At first I thought they were landing lights from an aircraft," he said. "As I continued to observe them they began to slowly disappear, then suddenly one reappeared, followed by two, then three. On at least one occasion four or five appeared. Each time they would slowly fade and eventually disappear. This occurred several times and when they would reappear they might do so in differing numbers and in different positions, sometimes in a triangular shape, sometimes stacked on top of each other, sometimes line abreast, etc. When the objects appeared they might stay illuminated 10 or more minutes."

Fields' wife thought the lights may have been ground-based, but Fields says he's certain they were airborne.

"I'm certain it wasn't an aircraft [from Earth]," said Fields, who also ruled out the possibility of flares, saying they didn't descend like flares typically do. "It's not anything I ever had any experience with . ... They were some kind of energy or something."

Fields snapped numerous images of the white, yellow and orange lights using a Canon digital camera with 6 megapixel resolution.

The story received heightened exposure after being posted on the Drudge Report yesterday, and became one of the most-viewed news reports in WND history. That prompted many others to contact WND, saying they witnessed the same or similar phenomenon.

"When I read this story, I literally got chill bumps all over my body, because it was exactly as I remember it also," said Will Childers of Camden, Ark., who says he saw the same lights Jan. 10 at approximately 7:15 p.m. in southern Arkansas.

A pilot from Lancaster, Pa., says he witnessed the mystery lights two years ago over northwestern Arkansas.

"I contacted Air Traffic Control and asked if they were handling or painting any aircraft off my left, and they informed me there no aircraft visible on radar in that direction for a couple of hundred miles," Rick Armellino told WND. "About 15 or 20 minutes after first noticing these two lights, both began changing position relative to one another, and then multiplied into about five or six smaller lights which began orbiting each another fairly briskly, and then simply just disappeared, leaving me very perplexed."


Richard Mobley, a software developer who commutes from Scottsdale, Ariz., to his home in Tucson, says he witnessed "the same exact thing" Fields described, noting his incident took place Nov. 15, 2006.

Mobley registered the following characteristics about the behavior of the objetcs:

  • They appeared over the Gila Indian Reservation and moved southeast;
  • I saw one, then two, then three, then four and five of these objects light up;
  • Each lit up at a different time and went out at different times;
  • Sometimes they would be in a row, and at other times they would appear stacked close to each other (bunched up or on top of each other);
  • They were about 6,000 to 10,000 feet off the ground moving, high enough to fly over the mountain range;
  • The light (when lit) was a round, super intense amber light which seemed to illuminate the ground below them;
  • They would light up for about five to seven minutes and then dim down and go out;
  • After about three minutes of being out, they would light back up, going from dim to intense amber light (not clear color like airplane landing lights);
  • There was an aircraft in the area which had landing lights on as well as a beacon light (red and green on the wings and tail) so to distinguish between these object and a plane was easy;
  • The amount of light given off at the height at which they were flying showed these objects were quite large.

In Belton, Texas, Jim Martin, a national sales manager for Clear Channel Radio says he, too, "observed a bright, white round light looking exactly like Col. Fields' pictures," but his sighting was Dec. 22, 2006.

Martin speculated it might have been a meteor headed directly toward him since "it did not vary in location in the sky" and that "it slowly dissipated without losing altitude."

And Jeff Pement of Pensacola, Fla., says he saw the same phenomenon as well.

"Except for the duration of time the lights stay visible, the description of the lights is exactly as I have seen it. Some of my friends think I am crazy. A few have witnessed them as I have taken them to the spot where I would typically see them. When I read Col. Fields' words describing what he saw, it was as if I was relating the event to someone."

A spokesman for the Air Force Space Command headquarters at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado told WND he had not heard anything like what was reported, but he would check into it.

In Fields' hometown of Van Buren, comet-watcher Mike Holloway was photographing Comet McNaught in the sky the same night of the colonel's sighting, and he said what Fields had witnessed was apparently something quite different from the comet.


Comet McNaught (C/2006 P1) soaring over Van Buren, Ark., Jan. 9, 2007 (photo: Mike Holloway, used with permission)

"I do not think this has anything to do with the comet that was visible in the west sky just after sunset," Holloway told WND. "I imaged the comet on the 8th and 9th of January, and these lights look nothing like the comet."

Meanwhile, a digital-production expert in Columbia, S.C., analyzed the photographs taken by Fields, processing both the yellow-light image and the orange-light image through various filters using computer software.

"I was kind of surprised," said Mark Kirby, president and CEO of EIC Research, Inc.

When Kirby did a black-and-white analysis of the yellow light image, he noted "it looks like a clean silhouette of someone sitting behind a console or flight control."


Enhanced image of yellow-light photo taken by Col. Brian Fields shows an image in the center possibly resembling a pilot sitting behind a console (Enhanced image (c) 2007 EIC Research, Inc.)

When he examined the orange light, he said the result was "a bit scary," as he perceived what seemed like a face looking directly ahead.

"You could literally see two eyes and a mouth," Kirby said. "It looked like someone looking at you."


Enhanced image of orange-light photo taken by Col. Brian Fields, with mysterious figure highlighted inside circle (Enhanced image (c) 2007 EIC Research, Inc.)


Enhanced image of orange-light photo taken by Col. Brian Fields, transferred to black and white, with mysterious figure highlighted inside circle (Enhanced image (c) 2007 EIC Research, Inc.)

Kirby, who says he doesn't really believe in extraterrestrial life from elsewhere in the universe, wondered, "Could this be the first actual photo of visitors from another planet?"

He also proffered a more earthly explanation, saying, "It's not far-fetched to believe it's something our military has developed."

Nearly a decade ago, in March 1997, hundreds of Arizona residents witnessed strange illuminations in the sky, which have come to be known as "the Phoenix Lights," a mystery which has yet to be resolved.

Some readers have suggested the possibility of "earthquake lights," which are believed to be flashes or glows of light associated with strong seismic activity.

Still others maintain the "not of this world" lights were definitely nothing supernatural.

"I get a little annoyed by 'prior military people' talking about 'strange lights in the sky,'" said James Whitesell of Greenwood, Ind. "Tell the former Air Force officer to step back and take a deep breath ... . It was likely an illumination round of some type."

Stephen Richard Armour, an American missionary working as a video producer in Brazil since 1977, thinks the event could likely be a hoax similar to one he witnessed.

"Some clever kids had taken a clear [2 liter] Coke bottle, inverted it and cut little breathing holes in the top and one in the exact center of the inverted bottom," he said. "They had then put a lit candle in the cap, stuck a toothpick tied to a string in the center hole and had then hung the string down about 50 feet or so from [a] black kite, hanging from the dark string they used. When they flew the kite up high, it was big enough to pull the candlelit Coke bottle up, which then very convincingly, bobbed up and down (like a yo-yo) with the kite."

Armour suggests Fields, who is honestly reporting what he saw, was simply "suckered."

"No aliens, no demons," he said, "only kids or malicious adults with some multiple kite variation of this trick."

Friday, January 12, 2007

UFO CENTER DOCUMENTS THOUSANDS LIKE O'HARE CASE

Earlier Chicago UFO (2005) with similar description to 11/2006 sighting

From BLOGCRITICS http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/01/05/100827.php
About Those Chicago UFO Sightings
Written by Glen Boyd
Published January 05, 2007

When it comes to coverage by the national media, UFOs (or Unidentified Flying

Objects), generally speaking at least, are not a story topping the agenda of

your more credible news organizations. In fact, when it comes to such stories,

the unwritten rule has always seemed to be that such reporting is best left to

the supermarket tabloids.

This week however, was one where the mainstream media apparently never got that

memo. Unless I've missed something, three stories topped the mainstream news

this week:

Gerald Ford's funeral.

Saddam Hussein's execution.

And the UFO sighted by numerous eyewitnesses at Chicago's O'Hare Airport.

According to the reports, several eyewitnesses (including pilots and other

credible personnel) watched a classic disc-shaped UFO hover over the airport

before it shot straight up into the air at a very high rate of speed and

disappeared into the clouds. If you missed it, you can view an interview with

the Chicago Tribune reporter who broke the story here:

So here's a confession.

I've actually followed the subject of UFOs most of my life. I first got

interested when, as a pre-teen boy, I saw something strange myself. Without

going into all of the details, I saw what I would call a grey, football-shaped

object up in the sky while peering out the back window of my parents car during

an afternoon drive in the country.

In the years since, I've read most of the literature dealing with UFOs out

there. I even briefly wrote the "Webwatch" column for UFO Magazine, recommending

the best UFO websites to readers during the nineties, the UFO "boom years."

Like the roughly one half (or better) of all Americans who believe there

actually may be something to all this flying saucer stuff, I've come to a few

conclusions. Now before you reach over to cue the X-Files music, please note my

hesitance to state what that "something" may actually be.

I do believe "something" that is not birds or conventional aircraft is flying

around out there and has been for sometime. I also believe that most people

probably don't give it a second thought - at least if you believe the surveys

concluding that more than half of the population shares the view that UFOs are

real.

This is why I find many of the circumstances surrounding the Chicago UFO

sighting reported this week so inexplicable. According to the Chicago Tribune

report, both the airline and the FAA initially denied anybody saw anything. When

further digging by the reporter — armed with a Freedom Of Information Act

request no less — revealed otherwise, the FAA admitted they had been contacted

about the sighting, which they now dismiss as being due to odd weather

conditions at the time.

Perhaps those "conditions" include the perfect "hole in the sky" that some

witnesses described the object left after it tore through the cloud cover at

O'Hare, and off into space that day.

Speaking of that day, the sighting occurred on November 7th. So why did the

national news media wait until this week to report the story en masse?

Incidentally, that kind of lag time is not a first when it comes to the media's

timetable in reporting a mass UFO sighting over a major American city.

As I mentioned above, the nineties were kind of a "boom time" for UFOs. Between

things like the X-Files on TV, and movies like Independence Day and Men In

Black, UFOs and aliens became as much a part of American Pop Culture in the

nineties as Gangsta Rap and Monday Night Wrestling. The most popular national

late night radio show of the time, hosted by Art Bell, was itself devoted almost

entirely to the subject of UFOs. Just between you and me — from lunchboxes to TV

car ads — those little grey guys seemed to be just about everywhere.

On March 13, 1997, a spectacular mass UFO sighting took place in the American

Southwest. Though it has since come to be known as the "Phoenix Lights"

sighting, the strange V-shaped formation of unidentified lights — which

stretched across the entire night sky — was seen by hundreds of witnesses across

the entire state of Arizona. It was also videotaped by dozens of them.

The videos can still be easily found with a Google search. To save you the

trouble, you can check it out here:

The original "Phoenix Lights" event quickly became the buzz of UFOlogy through

the Internet and shows like Art Bell's. Still, as was the case with the Chicago

sighting reported this week, it would not be covered by the mainstream media

until several weeks later. The "Phoenix Lights" story eventually devolved into a

media circus with city politicians donning alien costumes for the cameras, even

as one (now former) councilwoman named Frances Barwood urged officials to

conduct a serious investigation into the mass sighting.

The question now, as then, is simply this:

If there really isn't anything to all of this crazy UFO stuff, just why is it

that so many folks in powerful positions act so crazy when it comes to the

subject? You'd almost swear they were actually hiding something. At the very

least, it would seem they'd prefer you and I didn't know about it.

Now you can go ahead and cue that X-Files music.

Mystery Lingers Over Chicago UFO Claims
The head of the National UFO Reporting Center gives his theories about the
strange sighting over Chicago’s main airport.

WEB EXCLUSIVE
By Jessica Bennett
Newsweek
Updated: 3:33 p.m. ET Jan 4, 2007

Jan. 4, 2007 - The Federal Aviation Administration says it must have been a

weird weather phenomenon, and United Airlines denies any knowledge of the case.

But though it has been two months since what appeared to be an unidentified

flying object (UFO) was spotted over Chicago's O'Hare International Airport, the

incident is still raising questions about what exactly was seen and whether the

authorities are trying to downplay it.

As many as a dozen United Airlines employees swear the mysterious object they

saw on Nov. 7 was real—hovering for several minutes above the United Airlines

terminal and then shooting up through the clouds so powerfully that it left an

eerie hole in overcast skies. "At first we laughed to each other" when the

report came over the radio, a witness told the National UFO Reporting Center, a

Seattle-based nonprofit that maintains a UFO hotline and is listed as a resource

in the FAA's official Aeronautical Information Manual. But then I saw the "dark

gray, hazy, round object" and seconds later "there was an almost perfect circle

in the cloud layer where the craft had been." His statement is published on the

Web site of the National UFO Reporting Center, which says its policy is to

protect the anonymity of its witnesses.

So was it a UFO? A secret military aircraft? And why did it take two months for

the details to come out? It may sound like the oldest hoax in the book, but the

United workers—including several pilots—who say they saw the object are

reportedly upset their claims have been ignored. The FAA has said it won't be

investigating the incident further, and it wasn't until this week that The

Chicago Tribune broke the story, speaking to several unnamed witnesses after a

tip-off from the head of the National UFO Reporting Center. Peter Davenport

heads that organization, and has a lot to say about the way the incident has

been handled. A self-described UFOologist, Davenport spoke with NEWSWEEK's

Jessica Bennett. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: Your Web site has documented more than 3,000 UFO sightings just in the

last year. Is that normal?
Peter Davenport: We get reports that number certainly into the thousands, and

sometimes into the tens of thousands.

How many of these do you believe are real, and how do you determine whether they

are real?
The overwhelming majority of [reports we get] are not UFOs. Many people report

stars and planets and aircraft and humming birds and pelicans and Frisbees and

hubcaps—there are thousands of things people can look at and not be able to

identify. We rely on our experience to try to quickly identify those cases that

are probably not genuine UFOs.

How long have you known about this particular incident in Chicago?
I found out about this on the day of the event. We got multiple communications.

We released the information about the 12th or 13th of November, put it on our

homepage, and, frankly, I was flabbergasted that nobody was paying attention.

Do you think there has been an effort to downplay it?
My strong suspicion is that this case showed up on the 8th of November—the day

after it happened—in the intelligence briefing document that the president

apparently reads every morning. Are we to believe that a UFO can appear over a

major U.S. airport and the American intelligence community is not informed of

it? That proposition is absurd.

If that's the case, why would the federal government keep those findings from

the public?
You've got to go directly to the government or to United Airlines [for the

answer to that question]. I'm shocked by their response to this, except for the

fact that we've seen this kind of response—certainly on behalf of the

government—for the past 59 and a half years.

What happened 59 years ago?
That takes us back to the first formal sighting that caused a ripple in the

press, which was June 24, 1947, here in the state of Washington. That was Mr.

[Kenneth] Arnold, who saw a string of [disc]-shaped objects streaking down the

Cascade Mountains [near Mount Rainier]. That was the event that gave us the term

"flying saucer."

Still, there are a lot of UFO skeptics out there. What do you say to them?
I've been asked that question about half a dozen times before. Skeptics are free

to think whatever they wish. All I do is release the information—hopefully,

accurate information—and people may read it or consume it anyway they wish. But

many of these hard-boiled skeptics simply do not look at the data. They have a

preconceived notion of how the universe works—what is possible, what is not

possible—to the extent that they no longer have to look at data.

What is that data?

The data are the cases that come in, the information that we're receiving on a

steady basis—over the telephone, over the Internet, photographs and so on.

Probably the most reliable source of data that we receive is eyewitness accounts

from responsible witnesses who seem to be independent of one another. That's not

true of all the people who contact us, of course. We get calls of many, many

stripes. But we focus on the cases that are very well documented—as in the case

of the O'Hare sighting.

So you've spoken to the witnesses in this case.
Yes, that's how we got the information.

And you think they're credible?
The witnesses [in this case] are not only responsible but they're qualified by

virtue of the fact that they've worked in the aviation industry for decades—each

one of them. They're familiar with aircraft, they're familiar with weather

phenomena. United Airlines and the FAA have apparently taken the position that

it either didn't happen, or if it did happen it was a weather aberration. Well,

the written communications that I have in my possession clearly belie that

position.

So you obviously believe that UFOs do exist.
My objective is to give the American people the information that they need to

have, in my opinion, in order to make a rational decision with regard to the UFO

phenomenon. In a sense, I guess I'm an advocate for the notion that our planet

is visited on a frequent basis by these things we call UFOs. If my theory and

the theory of many other UFO investigators is correct, then the U.S. government

certainly knows about this [phenomenon], and has known about it for at least six

decades and is not sharing that with the American people. I believe that is

wrong.

How do you define a UFO, and what elements of that definition were visible in

what was seen at O'Hare?
From my standpoint, [UFOs] are those objects that exhibit characteristics that

strongly suggest that they, almost without a doubt, are not of man's

manufacture. That statement I think is supported by the fact that these UFO

sightings appear to go back hundreds or thousands of years. We have reports on

our Web site from the 1930s, from the 1890s, from 1860, and I have two written

reports on file—one from China in the 12th century A.D. and a report from

ancient Egypt from 1770 B.C. So could that be the U.S. Air Force experimenting

with aircraft? Clearly not. In the case of this object at O'Hare, [the object

sighted] seemed to accelerate so fast and disappear so fast that people's eyes

were unable to follow it, and they didn't know which way it had gone. Now, could

that be of man's manufacture? I doubt it.

Why is there so little debate on this subject?
People think that UFOs are strange. But in my opinion, the reaction of the

American press to the UFO phenomenon is stranger still. They're not interested

in what I consider to be the greatest scientific question of man's existence of

all times: are we alone in this galaxy or are we not? From my vantage point, the

clear answer to that is that we're not. And it appears that these objects visit

our planet on a regular basis.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16472286/site/newsweek/
© 2007 MSNBC.com

Tuesday, January 9, 2007

YESTERDAY'S O'HARE PIC - NOT WHAT IT SEEMS

"UFOs" As Contemporary Art


Not *exactly* a hoax....but, our good friend "Mr. UFO" has informed us that the photo on yesterday's blog cane be seen in a totally different light (pun intended) if you look on the original page - http://www.ufoart.net/ - the artist has this to say: "

A NOTE FROM THE ARTIST
"Whether you are a believer or a skeptic you must agree that UFOs have become a major part of our planets cultural vibration. These photo real works are a result of my dreams and hopes that friendly extraterrestrials will soon contact us and bless Earth with their advanced knowledge and peaceful social sensibilities. When these lucid artworks are framed and hung on your favorite wall or workspace you may feel the same positive resonance I felt when creating them." - Chuck Cirino

As our friend of many years and various investigations puts it, "Go to the site where it originates www.weirdamerica.com and you will see its an obvious fake -- its a ship from earth vs the flying saucers." mrufo@webtv.net "The Earth vs. the Flying Saucers" was a classic Ray Harryhausen 1950s sfx film - one of the best, but definitely fiction. "Mars Attacks" uses a great deal from this source in spoofing sci-fi genre films.

ALLEGED UFO FROM O'HARE AIRPORT

I have not yet evaluated this, but see Off On A Tangent for the story.

Thursday, January 4, 2007

UFO FOLLOW-UP, FUNDAMENTALIST COPS

The story made CNN and (ug) Fox last night, but you read it here first.

Here is an *excellent* audio interview on the UFO incident in Chicago, called to my attention by old friend "Mr. UFO" a/k/a Commander X. http://www.ufocasebook.com/ohareupdate.html. There are rumors that film footage was obtained at the time of this incident. We are on this. Stay tuned.

This from http://www.alternet.org/story/46211/ via our old friend and fellow author Brad Steiger.

America's Holy Warriors

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted January 4, 2007.

The radical Christian Right is coming dangerously close to its goal of taking over the country’s military and law enforcement.
Tools


The drive by the Christian right to take control of military chaplaincies, which now sees radical Christians holding roughly 50 percent of chaplaincy appointments in the armed services and service academies, is part of a much larger effort to politicize the military and law enforcement. This effort signals the final and perhaps most deadly stage in the long campaign by the radical Christian right to dismantle America’s open society and build a theocratic state. A successful politicization of the military would signal the end of our democracy.

During the past two years I traveled across the country to research and write the book "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America." I repeatedly listened to radical preachers attack as corrupt and godless most American institutions, from federal agencies that provide housing and social welfare to public schools and the media. But there were two institutions that never came under attack -- the military and law enforcement. While these preachers had no interest in communicating with local leaders of other faiths, or those in the community who did not subscribe to their call for a radical Christian state, they assiduously courted and flattered the military and police. They held special services and appreciation days for all four branches of the armed services and for various law enforcement agencies. They encouraged their young men and women to enlist or to join the police or state troopers. They sought out sympathetic military and police officials to attend church events where these officials were lauded and feted for their Christian probity and patriotism. They painted the war in Iraq not as an occupation but as an apocalyptic battle by Christians against Islam, a religion they regularly branded as "satanic." All this befits a movement whose final aesthetic is violence. It also befits a movement that, in the end, would need the military and police forces to seize power in American society.

One of the arguments used to assuage our fears that the mass movement being built by the Christian right is fascist at its core is that it has not yet created a Praetorian Guard, referring to the paramilitary force that defied legal constraints, made violence part of the political discourse and eventually plunged ancient Rome into tyranny and despotism. A paramilitary force that operates outside the law, one that sows fear among potential opponents and is capable of physically silencing those branded by their leaders as traitors, is a vital instrument in the hands of despotic movements. Communist and fascist movements during the last century each built paramilitary forces that operated beyond the reach of the law.

And yet we may be further down this road than we care to admit. Erik Prince, the secretive, mega-millionaire, right-wing Christian founder of Blackwater, the private security firm that has built a formidable mercenary force in Iraq, champions his company as a patriotic extension of the U.S. military. His employees, in an act as cynical as it is deceitful, take an oath of loyalty to the Constitution. These mercenary units in Iraq, including Blackwater, contain some 20,000 fighters. They unleash indiscriminate and wanton violence against unarmed Iraqis, have no accountability and are beyond the reach of legitimate authority. The appearance of these paramilitary fighters, heavily armed and wearing their trademark black uniforms, patrolling the streets of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, gave us a grim taste of the future. It was a stark reminder that the tyranny we impose on others we will one day impose on ourselves.

"Contracting out security to groups like Blackwater undermines our constitutional democracy," said Michael Ratner, the president of the Center for Constitutional Rights. "Their actions may not be subject to constitutional limitations that apply to both federal and state officials and employees -- including First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights to be free from illegal searches and seizures. Unlike police officers they are not trained in protecting constitutional rights and unlike police officers or the military they have no system of accountability whether within their organization or outside it. These kind of paramilitary groups bring to mind Nazi Party brownshirts, functioning as an extrajudicial enforcement mechanism that can and does operate outside the law. The use of these paramilitary groups is an extremely dangerous threat to our rights."

The politicization of the military, the fostering of the belief that violence must be used to further a peculiar ideology rather than defend a democracy, was on display recently when Air Force and Army generals and colonels, filmed in uniform at the Pentagon, appeared in a promotional video distributed by the Christian Embassy, a radical Washington-based organization dedicated to building a "Christian America."

The video [Watch it HERE], first written about by Jeff Sharlet in the December issue of Harper’s Magazine and filmed shortly after 9/11, has led the Military Religious Freedom Foundation to raise a legal protest against the Christian Embassy’s proselytizing within the Department of Defense. The video was hastily pulled from the Christian Embassy website and was removed from YouTube a few days ago under threats of copyright enforcement.

Dan Cooper, an undersecretary of veterans affairs, says in the video that his weekly prayer sessions are "more important than doing the job." Maj. Gen. Jack Catton says that his being an adviser to the Joint Chiefs of Staff is a "wonderful opportunity" to evangelize men and women setting defense policy. "My first priority is my faith," he says. "I think it’s a huge impact. ... You have many men and women who are seeking God’s counsel and wisdom as they advise the chairman [of the Joint Chiefs] and the secretary of defense."

Col. Ralph Benson, a Pentagon chaplain, says in the video: "Christian Embassy is a blessing to the Washington area, a blessing to our capital; it’s a blessing to our country. They are interceding on behalf of people all over the United States, talking to ambassadors, talking to people in the Congress, in the Senate, talking to people in the Pentagon, and being able to share the message of Jesus Christ in a very, very important time in our world is winning a worldwide war on terrorism. What more do we need than Christian people leading us and guiding us, so, they’re needed in this hour."

The group has burrowed deep inside the Pentagon. It hosts weekly Bible sessions with senior officers, by its own count some 40 generals, and weekly prayer breakfasts each Wednesday from 7 to 7:50 a.m. in the executive dining room as well as numerous outreach events to, in the words of the organization, "share and sharpen one another in their quest to bridge the gap between faith and work."

If the United States falls into a period of instability caused by another catastrophic terrorist attack, an economic meltdown or a series of environmental disasters, these paramilitary forces, protected and assisted by fellow ideologues in the police and military, could swiftly abolish what is left of our eroding democracy. War, with the huge profits it hands to businesses and right-wing interests that often help bankroll the Christian right, could become a permanent condition. And the thugs with automatic weapons, black uniforms and wraparound sunglasses who appeared on street corners in Baghdad and New Orleans could appear on streets across the U.S. Such a presence could paralyze us with fear, leaving us unable to question or protest the closed system and secrecy of an emergent totalitarian state and unable to voice dissent.

"The Bush administration has already come close to painting our current wars as wars against Islam -- many in the Christian right apparently have this belief," Ratner said. "If these wars, bad enough as imperial wars, are fought as religious wars, we are facing a very dark age that could go on for a hundred years and that will be very bloody."

Digg!

Tagged as: christian right, militarization, law enforcement, church and state

Chris Hedges is the former Middle East bureau chief for The New York Times and the author of "War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning."